California’s housing crunch is getting more attention after a major data release: roughly one in five California homes is now owned by investors. In other words, about 19% of the state’s housing stock is investor-owned. This statistic caught headlines because it comes amid a California home affordability crisis – median home prices jumped 50% in the past six years – and buyers are struggling to compete. The big question is: Are investors buying homes in California, and what does that mean for people trying to buy a home? In fact, experts say yes, investors are active in the market, and their presence can make it even tougher for first-time buyers. New data from real estate analytics firm BatchData (analyzed by local press) show that 19% of all California homes are owned by investors. (Nationally, investors hold about 20% of homes, so California is roughly on par.)

A typical California single-family home. About 19% of homes in the state are now owned by investors, contributing to the state’s housing affordability crisis.

This shift to investor ownership is just one more sign of the affordability crisis. The Guardian reports that 19% investor ownership is “the latest sign of an affordability crisis that shows no end in sight”. California has long had one of the nation’s tightest housing markets, with severe under-supply of new homes and sky-high prices. (For context, only about 17–18% of California households could actually afford the median-priced home in 2024–2025.) When almost 20% of properties are in investors’ hands, regular buyers often lose out on supply. In short, yes, investors are buying up California homes, and the result is fiercer competition and higher prices for everyone else.

Where Investors Hold Homes in California

The investor ownership is uneven across the state. In general, rural or resort areas have the highest shares, while the expensive coastal metro areas have lower shares. For example, Sierra County in the mountains has a staggering 83% of its homes owned by investors. Seven California counties (mostly small or tourist-heavy) have over half their housing owned by investors. By contrast, big urban counties with sky-high home values have much lower investor shares: Los Angeles County is about 15% investor-owned, and San Francisco, San Diego, Orange, and other coastal counties are around 16%. In other words, even L.A. – where buying is famously hard – has most homes (85%) owned by individual owners or non-investors. The statewide figure (19%) actually ranks California 36th among U.S. states by percentage, behind places like Hawaii (40%) and Alaska (35%). But because California is populous and expensive, the total number of investor-owned homes is huge: about 1.45 million homes, second only to Texas’s 1.66 million.

These differences matter. It means that Southern California markets (Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, etc.) have moderate investor activity, whereas many inland or mountain communities are dominated by investors. For example, the data report shows places like Trinity (77%), Mono (74%), and Alpine (68%) in Northern California with extremely high investor shares. In contrast, venture coastal suburbs like Ventura County are only about 14% investor-owned. In plain terms, this means homebuyers in remote or recreation-heavy areas may face a very different market – often lots of investment deals – than buyers in big city suburbs, where most homes are still owned by residents.

Overall, California’s housing market 2025 still looks incredibly tight. The California Association of Realtors (CAR) forecasts only modest growth for next year – median home prices above $900,000 in 2025 – but that still keeps prices near all-time highs. Between the investor buy-up and historically high prices, the average buyer faces an uphill struggle.

Impact of Investors on Home Prices

How exactly do investors affect prices? The short answer: they tend to push prices up, not down. Because investors often pay all-cash or very large down payments, they can outbid typical buyers. This bidding pressure drives sale prices higher. In fact, housing experts warn that investor demand is not alleviating high prices. In one analysis, a housing policy researcher observed: “investors are pouring billions of dollars of cash into real estate, but that is not putting downward pressure on prices… We would argue that’s putting upward pressure on prices.”. In other words, even though investors bring money into the market (providing liquidity for sellers), that money mostly bids up home values.

The BatchData report itself acknowledged this dynamic. It notes that many “traditional buyers [are] sidelined by affordability constraints” – essentially, unaffordable prices and high mortgage rates keep regular homebuyers out – while investors are providing essential liquidity. That “liquidity” is just investors buying what little inventory is available. But as one housing activist notes, if investors keep snapping up newly built homes (say, 20% of new supply), then building more houses won’t necessarily lower costs for owner-occupants. Instead, it could become a cycle where new units are partly absorbed by investors, keeping overall stock tight for regular buyers.

Investors also come in different sizes. The data show that roughly 85% of investor-owned homes in California (and the U.S.) are held by small landlords with just 1–5 properties. Only about 10% of investor-owned homes are held by larger owners (6 or more properties). So far this means institutional investors (large investment funds, pension funds, etc.) make up a smaller slice of total ownership. However, the presence of these big players is growing. Some recent market reports indicate that very large investors (the so-called mega-investors) have dramatically increased their purchase volumes in 2025. In short, both mom-and-pop rental owners and deep-pocketed firms are buying homes, and together their bids are helping to keep California’s home prices at record levels.

All of this matters for buyers. With nearly 20% of homes off the market for family buyers, and investors crowding the bidding, sale prices tend to be bid up. According to the data, investors accounted for 26.8% of all U.S. home sales in Q1 2025 (the highest share in five years). This spike came largely because traditional buying power fell. For example, the doubling of mortgage rates in 2022 priced many buyers out, so the share of homes sold to investors jumped. The key point: investors did not so much buy dramatically more homes as owner-occupant demand shrank. As one news headline put it, “Purchasing a home in California is hard enough before you realize that almost one-fifth of them have been gobbled up by investors.” Investors didn’t cause the affordability crisis, but they are exploiting it – flooding the market with cash offers when others are sidelined – which has the net effect of fueling the price surge.

Challenges for First-Time Home Buyers in California

One of the hardest-hit groups are first-time homebuyers. In California’s high-priced market, first-timers often have the least cash and the most difficulty qualifying. Affordability is dismal for newcomers: by mid-2025 only about 17% of California households could afford a median-priced home. That means over 80% of families in the state simply couldn’t buy a typical home with their income and savings. Of course, all buyers face higher costs (the nationwide affordability index fell to a record low of 21% of buyers being first-time in 2024). But in California the situation is particularly extreme. According to state economist data, in late 2025 a California household needed over $220,000 in annual income to qualify for a mortgage on the median-priced home. By comparison, the median household income in California is only about $102,000 (2024). This huge gap – buyers needing twice the median income – means many families are simply priced out of the market before they even see a listing.

And when these would-be buyers do try to compete, they often lose to investors. Investors usually bid in cash or with very large down payments. This can out-compete conventional buyers (many of whom use FHA or other loans and require financing). As one real estate agent wrote in mid-2025, “investors are buying everywhere… nearly half the market” in some regions, and this “pushes prices higher and makes it nearly impossible for first-time buyers with limited savings to compete”. (That article reported that in 2025 H1, investors accounted for over 40% of purchases in Los Angeles/Orange and 37% in San Diego.) We should treat those specific numbers cautiously, but the trend is clear: investors significantly cut into the pool of homes that might otherwise go to families or new buyers.

So the challenge for first-time home buyers in California is a double-whammy: high prices + stiff competition. On one hand, home prices have soared far beyond income growth. Monthly payments on a typical home jumped by about 74% since 2020, driven by soaring purchase prices and rising mortgage rates. Meanwhile, many existing homeowners locked in very low mortgage rates (e.g. 3–4%) have no incentive to sell; the state’s data show ~79% of homeowners have interest rates below 5%. This “lock-in effect” means few existing homes come on the market, so inventory is tight. On the other hand, investors are swooping in on whatever does become available. In fact, one analysis found that investors bought roughly 41,000 more homes than they sold in the first half of 2025 nationwide, increasing competition for remaining buyers. In short: first-time buyers in California face a steep uphill battle in today’s market. As a San Diego housing newsletter put it, with “more than one-third of California homes going to investors, first-time buyers face an uphill battle”.

Why Homes Are Expensive in California

California’s market has long been one of the most expensive in the nation. Several factors explain why homes are so expensive in California now. First, supply is very limited. The state has strict zoning and development constraints in many areas, and construction has not kept pace with population growth. Economists estimate the U.S. is short roughly 4.5 million homes, a gap felt acutely in California. Second, demand is high: tech and economic growth keep buyers flocking here. Third, local costs (land, labor, regulations, wildfires, etc.) add to development costs. Fourth, and recently most important, interest rates and mortgage dynamics have driven up costs. Monthly mortgage payments in California were over $5,500 for a median home in late 2025 – even after rates began to fall. That’s a 74% jump since January 2020. In other words, even if home prices were static, rising interest rates made buying much more expensive per month (and vice versa).

All this results in homes in California being far pricier than the rest of the country. Legislative analysts report that California mid-tier home prices are more than twice the typical U.S. mid-tier home price. Even “bottom-tier” homes (the cheapest third) in California cost about 30% more than the U.S. mid-range home. These gaps have only widened in the past decade. When both the purchase price and the interest rate increase, they compound: our analysis shows California housing payments have grown nearly four times faster than wages since 2020. As a result, buying a home has become much harder, especially for newcomers. With average California house values (and payments) far outpacing income growth, it’s no wonder that only ~17% of households can afford the median-priced home.

Investors fit into this picture by soaking up scarce supply. In some markets, they convert available homes into rentals, which can push local rents higher as well. Others hold homes vacant or as short-term rentals (vacation rentals), which also removes units from the long-term housing pool. In fact, a recent article notes some California cities are moving to restrict investor rentals; Beverly Hills is considering a near-total ban on rental of single-family homes, and Santa Ana is limiting short-term rentals, to try to preserve housing stock. These local policy moves acknowledge that when investors treat homes as financial assets (rather than places to live), it can worsen the affordability problem.

Southern California Housing Market Trends

Southern California (Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego, etc.) is a major part of the state’s housing story. The trends there largely mirror statewide patterns, but with a few local twists. By late 2025, many Southern California buyers began to see slight easing in competition: mortgage rates had ticked down and more homeowners were listing properties, so price growth started to slow. In fact, statewide median prices fell about 2% from Q2 to Q3 2025 – the first quarterly drop in years – as the market cooled. CAR’s economists still expected home values to drift upward in 2025 (forecast ~4.6% rise to $909,400), but that outlook is more modest than the double-digit gains of prior years. In Southern California, this means median prices may plateau or inch higher rather than skyrocket. For example, as of late 2025 the median L.A. home price was often reported near $900k, only a few percent above a year earlier.

Still, Southern California remains very expensive overall. Neighborhoods with high quality of life or good schools have seen only minor relief. In a place like Los Angeles or Orange County, 16% investor ownership suggests about 84% of homes are non-investor, but those 16% still add competition. San Diego’s market saw roughly 16% investor homes too. That said, investors in SoCal are often different from those in rural areas: they tend to buy luxury or new-construction homes, or convert existing houses into rentals. The so-called impact of investors on home prices in Southern California is therefore a bit diluted by sheer wealth; many expensive homes sell to wealthy families, but even those families might be competing with private equity investors. Overall, housing demand in Southern California remains brisk, and inventory is only slowly building. So southern buyers still face the same essential challenges: very low affordability (the state median is essentially the SoCal median) and investor competition, albeit on a slightly cooler overall stage.

A modern Southern California home perched above Los Angeles. SoCal markets have seen prices level off in 2025, but affordability and competition (from all buyers) remain challenging.

California Housing Market 2025 Forecast

Looking ahead, official forecasts suggest only moderate changes for 2025. The California Association of REALTORS® projects about 4–5% home-price growth next year, with the median price rising to around $909,400. Sales volume is expected to rebound somewhat (over 300,000 single-family closings), as interest rates ease from mid-2024 highs. CAR expects the “lock-in” effect of homeowners with low rates to gradually weaken: by 2025 some sellers will finally list homes, boosting supply. Yet housing affordability is still expected to hover at historically low levels, near 16% of families who can afford a typical home. Put another way, even if prices stop climbing, so few people qualify that the homeownership rate will not rise much.

This forecast matters to investor-owned homes too. If inventory rises, investors may slow buying (some reports show big investors were selling more than buying in early 2025). But with an expected double-digit increase in existing home sales (10.5% growth), any serious shortage could ease. In a better market, one could hope traditional buyers regain share. The data trend is clear: investors bulged their share to record levels in 2022–2023 as buyers dropped out, but their share may retrace a bit if owner-buyers return. Even so, institutional investors are eyeing the long term. As one researcher put it, “What happens if you build more housing, and institutional investors are buying up 20% of the new stock? It’s like a never-ending cycle”. That warning highlights the bigger picture: just expanding supply may not help unless new homes go to owner-occupants rather than being scooped up by investment funds.

Institutional Investors and the Big Picture

It’s important to clarify what “investor” means here. The reports didn’t formally define it, but generally it includes anyone buying homes to hold as rentals or resell – from small landlords to billion-dollar corporations. In practice, the vast majority of investor-owned houses are held by small-scale landlords (85% own five or fewer homes). But the rise of larger institutional players (think major funds and REITs) is notable. These big investors are increasingly entering California’s housing. The guestimate is that mega-investors (those owning 1000+ homes) jumped from 3% to 11% of investor activity in 2025. Even if they still own a minority of properties, their impact is magnified: they have the capital to buy in bulk or outbid smaller bidders.

For everyday buyers, this trend raises questions. Some experts wonder if policy should constrain large investors – for example, by limiting how many homes an entity can own or by taxing extra homes heavily – to give families a better chance. Others argue that investors are simply providing needed rental housing when owner-occupiers can’t afford to buy. The truth likely lies in between: certainly investors have helped some sellers and filled some rental demand, but there is growing evidence they also exacerbate high rents and prices.

Whatever the solution, the reality is that Californians face a uniquely tough market in 2025. Why are homes so expensive in California? As noted above, the state’s housing costs are roughly double the U.S. average. Mortgage-rate effects have made buying dramatically more expensive than renting or before-2020 home-buying. California’s median home price (already $887k in late 2025) requires an income well above $200k to qualify for a mortgage. Investors step into this landscape, and their cash bids effectively raise the bar even higher. The situation has become so acute that California’s nonprofit housing groups call it a crisis, and reports routinely connect the investor share to worsening affordability.

In summary, roughly 19% of California’s homes are now investor-owned. This change is a symptom of California’s broader housing crunch: home prices are sky-high, and many buyers are shut out. For regular homebuyers – especially first-timers – this means even fewer options. It may take new policies or sustained construction increases to improve the outlook. Until then, everyday Californians are likely to keep asking why investors are snapping up so many homes, and how they can ever compete in this super-heated market.

Make Smarter Moves in a Market That’s Changing Fast

Thinking about buying or selling in today’s California housing market?
With investor-owned homes making up a growing share of the market, having the right strategy matters more than ever.

Jack Ma Real Estate helps buyers and sellers make smart decisions based on real market data, local trends, and clear advice—without pressure or confusion.

Whether you’re a first-time buyer, a homeowner planning your next move, or simply exploring your options, reach out to Jack Ma Real Estate to get honest guidance and a clear plan that fits your goals.

FAQ

1. Are investors buying homes in California more than regular buyers?

Investors have increased their share of purchases, especially during periods when high prices and interest rates push everyday buyers out. While most homes are still owned by individuals, investor activity has become more noticeable across the state.

2. What does “investor-owned homes in California” actually mean?

It refers to homes owned by individuals or companies that do not live in the property. These homes are usually rentals, vacation properties, or long-term investments rather than primary residences.

3. How do investors affect home prices?

The impact of investors on home prices is mostly felt through competition. Investors often use cash or large down payments, which can push prices higher and reduce options for buyers who rely on financing.

4. Why is it especially hard for first-time buyers in California?

First time home buyers in California face challenges such as high prices, limited inventory, strict lending rules, and competition from investors. These factors combine to make saving, qualifying, and winning an offer more difficult.

5. Is Southern California different from the rest of the state?

Southern California housing market trends show slightly lower investor ownership than some rural areas, but prices remain high. Demand stays strong, inventory is tight, and affordability remains a major concern for buyers.